- Coins
- 6
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Before ID check
- case by case
- Operator
- Latcas B.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
Scores, not ads
Best crypto and bitcoin casinos in Ireland, check by check
The full scored table sits here, built from licence registers, cash-out ceilings and verification clauses, not from marketing copy.
- Coins
- not read
- Withdrawal limit
- 1,000,000 USDT /week cl. 6.10
- Before ID check
- 2,500 EUR
- Operator
- Moon Technologies B.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Coins
- 13
- Withdrawal limit
- 5,000 USD /month cl. 11.5
- Before ID check
- US$2,500
- Operator
- Danneskjold Ventures B.V.
- Licence
- Curacao
- Coins
- 10
- Withdrawal limit
- 15,000 EUR /month cl. 11.8
- Before ID check
- case by case
- Operator
- Metlait SRL
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Coins
- 10
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Before ID check
- case by case
- Operator
- Zentari Limitada
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Coins
- not read
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Before ID check
- 2,000 USDT
- Operator
- Pixel Entertainment Limited
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Coins
- 8
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Before ID check
- case by case
- Operator
- Metaspins N.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Coins
- 10
- Withdrawal limit
- 4,000 EUR /day cl. 12
- Before ID check
- case by case
- Operator
- Novatrix SRL
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Coins
- 7
- Withdrawal limit
- 7,500 EUR /week cl. 12
- Before ID check
- case by case
- Operator
- Novatrix SRL
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Coins
- 9
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Before ID check
- case by case
- Operator
- RBGAMING N.V.
- Licence
- Anjouan Gaming Board
- Coins
- 6
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Before ID check
- case by case
- Operator
- Natural Nine B.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
- Coins
- not read
- Withdrawal limit
- not published
- Before ID check
- 2,500 EUR
- Operator
- MBet Solutions N.V.
- Licence
- Curaçao Gaming Authority
The score starts with the licence, not the brand
This page is the full scored table behind the phrase best crypto and bitcoin casinos in Ireland. The home page shows a result; this page shows the arithmetic. Every operator is scored against the same fixed set of checks, so a blank cell lowers the score rather than dropping the operator out of the denominator.
That denominator matters. A scoring system that only averages the documents it has read can hand a perfect score to a page nobody opened. The method here does not do that. An operator that publishes less scores lower, not higher, because the missing document is still a check that was not answered.
All twelve operators on this site are offshore. None holds or can hold an Irish licence. The relevant Irish regulator is the Gambling Regulatory Authority of Ireland, created by the Gambling Regulation Act 2024, and it took over oversight in March 2025. The Authority opens its first remote applications in February 2026 and issues its first remote licences from July 2026, but that phase covers betting, not online casino games. So for now, every casino in this comparison sits under a licence from Curaçao or Anjouan, and the score reflects how much of that licence register was actually read. A search for best crypto and bitcoin casinos Ireland without the word in asks for the same scored list.
Captured 6 September 2026. DuckDice files under ALSI-202509013-FI1, held by Zentari Limitada — a number taken from the Anjouan register rather than from the badge at the foot of this screen.
What the licence register shows and what it does not
The Curaçao entries include Bitcasino.io, Rocketpot, Metaspins, Shuffle, Sportsbet.io and Vave. Bitcasino.io holds licence number OGL/2023/111/0069, issued 2024-07-01, with status Active and holder Moon Technologies B.V. Rocketpot holds number 1668/JAZ under Curaçao, but the register entry held here carries no issue date, and the status is not read. That blank is shown as a blank, not as a missing rule. Metaspins holds OGL/2024/1063/0437, issued 2024-10-04, with holder Metaspins N.V. Shuffle holds OGL/2024/1337/0628, issued 2024-10-16, with holder Natural Nine B.V. Sportsbet.io holds OGL/2023/110/0072, issued 2024-07-22, with holder MBet Solutions N.V. Vave, the paid placement, holds OGL/2024/1676/0905, issued 2025-05-19, with holder Latcas B.V.
The Anjouan entries include Wild Fortune, DuckDice, Empire.io, Oshi Casino, PlayAmo and Rainbet. Wild Fortune holds ALSI-202509073-FI2, issued 2025-09-30, valid, holder Metlait SRL. DuckDice holds ALSI-202509013-FI1, issued 2025-09-16, valid, holder Zentari Limitada. Empire.io holds ALSI-132405042-FI3, issued 2024-05-28, valid, holder Pixel Entertainment Limited. Oshi Casino and PlayAmo both hold ALSI-202508056-FI2, issued 2025-08-25, valid, holder Novatrix SRL. Rainbet holds ALSI-152406029-FI2, issued 2024-06-14, valid, holder RBGAMING N.V.
No figure on this site is stated without the clause number or register entry it came from. Where a number is not published here, the field is empty. An empty field means the document was not read. It never means the operator has no such rule and never means zero. A reader who sees a blank should treat it as an unread clause, not as a guarantee.
Cash-out ceilings: the arithmetic of getting paid
Cash-out ceilings are printed where the terms set a maximum. Bitcasino.io publishes a cash-out ceiling of 1,000,000 USDT per week, with the clause on file. Rocketpot publishes a much lower ceiling: 5,000 USD per month. Wild Fortune publishes 15,000 EUR per month. Oshi Casino publishes 4,000 EUR per day, and PlayAmo publishes 7,500 EUR per week.
The other seven operators show an empty cash-out field. DuckDice, Empire.io, Metaspins, Rainbet, Shuffle, Sportsbet.io and Vave do not have a cash-out ceiling stated in the data block. That is not evidence that they pay unlimited amounts. It means the clause was either absent from the terms read, or the terms were not read on that point. The blank is the honest answer.
A cash-out ceiling interacts with verification and withdrawal requests. A weekly ceiling of 1,000,000 USDT sounds generous until a player checks whether the verification threshold triggers before that amount can be requested. The score awards points for a published ceiling, because a published ceiling is a term a player can read before depositing.
Verification clauses: when the account is checked
Verification clauses break into two groups: risk-based and threshold. Risk-based verification means the operator decides when to ask, and the clause often gives it the right to ask at any time. Threshold verification names a point, usually a cumulative deposit or withdrawal amount, after which documents are required. The score treats a readable clause as better than a blank, but it does not treat risk-based as identical to threshold.
Vave has risk-based verification at clause 8.7. Bitcasino.io has threshold verification at clause 6.6. Rocketpot has threshold verification at clause 11.4. Wild Fortune has risk-based verification at clause 18.1. DuckDice has risk-based verification at Section 2. Empire.io has threshold verification at clause 5.4.
Metaspins has risk-based verification at clause 9.7. Oshi Casino and PlayAmo both have risk-based verification at clause 12. Rainbet has risk-based verification at clauses 5.2 and 8.3. Shuffle has risk-based verification at clause 4.1. Sportsbet.io has threshold verification at clause 6.6. Each of those clause numbers is on file. A player who wants to know when the account will be checked can go to the operator’s terms and read the exact clause.
Captured 6 September 2026. Rocketpot's terms set the verification threshold at 2,500 USD under clause 11.4, a figure that appears nowhere on this screen.
Ireland acceptance and the offshore fact
All twelve operators on this site accept players in Ireland. For Vave, that acceptance is stated from the partner confirmation rather than from a restricted-country list read directly. For the other eleven, Ireland does not appear on their own published restricted-country lists. That is a factual point about the list, not a guarantee that the operator will always accept an Irish player.
None of these operators holds or can hold an Irish licence. The Irish regulator, the Gambling Regulatory Authority of Ireland, has no remote casino licensing phase open yet. Its first remote applications open in February 2026, and its first remote licences issue from July 2026 for betting only, not online casino games. Until an online casino licensing phase exists, every casino serving Ireland from Curaçao or Anjouan is unlicensed in Ireland.
That offshore status matters when a dispute arises. A player who has a complaint against an Anjouan or Curaçao operator cannot bring it to the Irish regulator, because the operator is not licensed there. The complaint goes to the offshore regulator, if it goes anywhere. The score does not penalise offshore status, because no Irish licence is available for these products yet, but it does publish the licence that exists.
The restricted-country clause in plain terms
A restricted-country list is written by the operator, not by the player’s country. It names the jurisdictions where the operator refuses to offer play, usually because of its own licence terms, payment arrangements or risk policy. The operator establishes where a player is by looking at the address given at registration, the country of the payment method, and the IP address the session came from. These are usually reconciled at the first withdrawal rather than at signup, because that is when the operator checks whether the player’s stated country matches the country suggested by the payment method and the IP.
When the answer comes back wrong, the terms generally say the account is closed, the balance is voided, and deposits are not always returned. An operator can void winnings and keep deposits if the player is found to be in a blocked country, because the operator’s terms treat that as a breach of the player’s representations. There is no appeal to the Irish regulator, because the operator holds no licence in Ireland. The player’s only route is the offshore regulator, and that regulator may not have a meaningful enforcement process.
Ireland appears on no restricted-country list held here. That is the relevant fact for an Irish reader. The explanation above matters for a player elsewhere, or for an Irish player who uses a payment method or connection that points to a different country. The terms void a balance where a VPN is used to disguise location, for example. That clause is in the operator’s terms, not a recommendation.
The paid placement and why it is outside the score
Vave is the paid placement on this site. Payment buys one position and zero points. That means Vave appears in a prominent place, but its score is calculated from the same fixed checks as every other operator. The placement does not change the arithmetic; it only changes where the name sits on the page.
Vave’s score is 7 of 10. Its licence entry is Curaçao Gaming Authority number OGL/2024/1676/0905, issued 2025-05-19, with holder Latcas B.V. and status Active. Its verification clause is risk-based at clause 8.7. Its cash-out ceiling field is empty, because no ceiling was read. Those facts are all published in the data block, and the score reflects them.
The paid placement is disclosed wherever Vave is named on this page and across the site. A reader who sees Vave in a top slot should not read that slot as a higher score. The score is 7. The position is bought. That distinction is the point of the comparison.
Reading the list without a table
The full scored table appears here, check by check, with every blank cell shown as a blank. An operator that publishes a licence number, an issue date, a cash-out ceiling and a verification clause scores higher than one that publishes only some of those. An empty field is not a disqualification, but it is not a point either.
The highest score on this list is 9 of 10, held by Bitcasino.io and Rocketpot. Bitcasino.io publishes a full licence entry, a cash-out ceiling of 1,000,000 USDT per week and a threshold verification clause. Rocketpot publishes a licence number but no issue date and a status that is not read, a cash-out ceiling of 5,000 USD per month and a threshold verification clause. The two scores are the same because the fixed checks weigh the published items equally, not because the operators are equivalent.
Wild Fortune scores 8 of 10, with an Anjouan licence and a cash-out ceiling of 15,000 EUR per month. The remaining operators score 7 of 10: DuckDice, Empire.io, Metaspins, Oshi Casino, PlayAmo, Rainbet, Shuffle, Sportsbet.io and Vave. Some of those 7s have a cash-out ceiling and some do not, which shows that a missing ceiling is not the only check. The score is a sum of the fixed checks, not a ranking of brand reputation.
For a reader searching for top crypto and bitcoin casinos Ireland or best bitcoin and crypto casino sites, the arithmetic is the same. The phrase best crypto and bitcoin casinos in Ireland leads to this page because the page is the scored table, not the marketing page. The link to the Bitcoin casino Ireland page shows the same method applied to a narrower currency set. The Ripple casinos page repeats the check for XRP, and the no-KYC crypto casinos page examines verification clauses in detail. The bonuses page reads the wagering multiples. Each linked page uses the same rule: a blank cell is shown as a blank, and a paid position is disclosed as paid.
Vave
Bitcasino.io
Rocketpot
Wild Fortune
DuckDice
Empire.io
Metaspins
Oshi Casino
PlayAmo
Rainbet
Shuffle
Sportsbet.io